Matthew Ujah-Peter
When I was a boy growing up I listened to good and
well-meaning people talking about leaving one’s foot prints on the sands of
time. But as thought-provoking as that idea may sound, it often left
question marks in my head. The amusing question that popped in my head in those
days and even now when I hear such statements (and people use it profusely
today than ever) is, ''don't sands get washed away by rains and winds?'' In my own
estimate, sands aren’t always good materials to build lasting investments on,
especially when it has something to do with posterity. So I preferred saying
that I'd like to carve my name on the rocks of times. That sounded more
concrete to me. But that was then.
The point is not about carving one’s name on stones or
leaving ones footsteps on the sands of times. Those are by-products. Those
aren’t what you seek. Those aren’t even the end-results. The quest to make life
comfortable for oneself and family is a honourable one but also an easy route
to becoming self-centred and missing the path that leads to creating a lasting
legacy beyond the boundaries of private achievements.
When Henry Ford ventured into mass production of the T-Model
Ford cars he wasn't about it for just himself, otherwise the face of the
automobile industry would have been a little different today. His aim for mass
production of cheap affordable cars was to make sure that everyone can afford
cars. He put a program in place for his staffs to own their own cars at the
time when owning a car was the exclusive privilege of the few wealthy upper
class citizens in his country. By making it easy for the ordinary man to own a
car, he created the catalyst for infrastructural development such as roads,
fuel stations, more mechanic workshops and service stations, etc. The
commercial and economic life of his city and nation began to improve on the
account of those amenities. With improved infrastructures social amenities
improved, villages developed into towns, and towns into cities.
The men who first thought of mass-producing shoes and
clothing; those who thought of mass housing, those who first thought of
electricity in every home; those who first came up with the idea of connecting
telephone to every home, gas to every home, television and radio for every home
and so on - whether their names are known and remembered or not - are the ones who
helped in making life more easier to live today. These are people who thought of
the good of others.
If our desires and thoughts are focused on helping to make
life better for others, Providence would give us life-saving ideas. But what we
do from ancient generation to date is to use what we have to dominate, exploit
and oppress others. This is why despite our huge reserves of natural resources;
Africa is still impoverished and struggling. Yet a country whose population is
no more than one of the smallest African countries with little or no natural
resources could come into our midst and take our men and women slaves to their
country and colonize the rest of us for years. African is rich in resources and
culture; strong in body, numerous in numbers but weak against a nation as small
in population as the Great Britain. The British didn’t colonize us because
they’re more in number; it was because we didn’t value our fellow men's lives.
And do we today?
How were they able to buy slaves from Africa? You could
argue that that was the past and that we should put the past behind us. So I
used to think. But as I observed our leadership system and the general
condition of the continent with all the educational institutions, educationists
and educated people, I fear we have not learned much. Let’s assume that there’s
no law against slavery today in the west, do you think our people and our
leaders would stop slave trade with the way things are today? You could argue
that the ones that bought slaves were guilty. Granted! But what value did we
place on ourselves to tell outsiders that we weren’t for sale?
Africans weren’t the only people colonized by the British.
America was, too. So were India and other nations. But I never read or heard
these sold their own kinds to the British as slaves as we did. Prior to their
coming we were killing our twins, calling them bad omens. We were sacrificing
our fellow men to deities. We were and are still calling some people outcasts.
Some people pride themselves in the culture of burying certain dead in the evil
forest. Thus we gave the West the impression that we are inferior humans by the
inhuman ways we treated ourselves
They were the ones who stopped slave-trade on their own, not
us. We did not stop selling, they stopped buying. They made a law against it in
their own land. Mary Slessor went on a crusade and successfully stopped the
killing of twins. Missionary introduced schools and hospitals. And all we could
say to that is that they brought foreign religion and supplanted our culture
and religion. Some people tenaciously held on to the old degrading ways. Yet we
haven’t given ourselves any better systems. The Chinese gave themselves an
educational system that experts says helped the Chinese learn mathematics
better and faster than even the western system. The Indians too, have gone
ahead to fashion out better systems for themselves. We have not given ourselves
anything better than the west gave us. Not even the way we govern ourselves.
Why is it so with them and not so
with us? I think it’s the eye they have for values. Their value system gave
them their economic systems. The price they place on human being is the result
of the worth they believe humans have. When you value human being you will want
to do the best for them. So, it is not a question of whether you are
remembered. No. It’s about solving human problems with the investment of your
abilities, gifts and skills on the bases of what you think people are worth.
When you are dead you will still live. When you are gone you will still be
here. It’s not about fame or name. It’s about your good work born out of a
desire to meet humanity's need. This is how great leaders outlived themselves: They carved their names on the hearts of men.
MAXIMUM RESPECT!
Thanks.
ReplyDeleteGood article.
ReplyDelete